Legal Opinion

United States v. Griffaw

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 18, 1997No. ACM 32356PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PEARSON, Senior Judge:

Appellant asks us to set aside the convening authority’s action because the post-trial *792processing of his case was seriously flawed. We agree and grant the requested relief.

Appellant pled guilty to stealing property from other airmen, wrongfully appropriating Air Force property, and being wilfully derelict in his duties by transporting a loaded firearm in his car’s glove box and storing ammunition in his dormitory room. The court sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, 18 months confinement, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to E-l.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. ReedUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. KinmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. DiazUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  5. United States v. ThompsonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. FieldsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  2. United States v. FaughnUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API