Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Blinkiron

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 20, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Harrison District Court. — IIon. O. H. Lewis, Judge. Action to recover for money alleged to have been loaned, and for the value of personal property alleged to have been taken and used by defendant. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant . appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, J. — I.

1. Appeal: practice: bin of exceptions teSaiimma" The appellee has filed a motion to strike from the records the bill of exceptions filed by defendant, on the ground that it was not . . filed, in the district court within the time . limi^ec*- hy the agreement of parties. Appellee has filed an additional abstract, in which he sets out evidence alleged to have been omitted from appellant’s abstract. It is not denied that all the evidence introduced on the trial is now before this court in the two abstracts submitted. U nder these circumstances; the motion to strike must be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conners v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newbury v. Getchell & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Gleiser v. McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Sheldon v. SteeleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Cudahy Packing Co. v. Sioux Nat. Bank of Sioux CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API