Legal Opinion

Austin Bridge Co. v. Teague

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1941No. 9007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

Appellee, B. C. Teague, sued appellants, Austin Bridge Company, Austin Road Company, and the Superior Lloyds .of America, as surety, for the difference in the wages paid him as an unskilled laborer and the wages claimed to be due him as a skilled laborer for work done on a public works contract; and on a trial to the court without a jury recovered judgment for $479.40 as the balance of wages due, less 1% for payment of old age benefits; $47.-94 as attorney’s fees; and 6% interest on the judgment from its date; hence this appeal.

Appellee sued as a third party beneficiary under a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. G., H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. Henry & DilleyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Chicago Fraternal Life Ins. Ass'n v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Oviett v. WarnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Hearn v. Ralph Sollitt & Sons Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas Highway Commission v. El Paso Building & Construction Trades CouncilTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Austin Bridge Co. v. TeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. El Paso Building & Construction Trades Council v. Texas Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. STUCKEY v. APEX MATERIALS, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API