Legal Opinion

United States v. Larry D. Richards

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1996No. 94-4052PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion

*1153ON REHEARING EN BANC

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to determine whether a combination of liquid by-products and methamphetamine constitute a “mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine” for purposes of sentencing under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b). Applied to the facts, we must decide whether thirty-two kilograms of liquid by-products containing methamphetamine, or twenty-eight grams of pure methamphetamine alone, should be used to calculate Defendant Larry D. Richards’ sentence under § 841(b). We conclude that the plain language of § 841(b), and Supreme Court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Neal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. Larry D. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. McCartyIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. United States v. Pamela Kuenstler, United States of America v. Gregory A. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roderic E. SPRAGUE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. In Re MontoyaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2005
  5. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API