Haygood v. State

Appellant, Roderick Haygood, was convicted of possession of greater than twenty pounds of cannabis, resisting an officer without violence, and knowingly driving with a suspended license. We reverse Appellant’s driving with a suspended license conviction because the State presented insufficient evidence on the “knowledge” element of the offense. As to Appellant’s remaining convictions and sentences, we affirm.

At trial, with respect to the driving with a suspended license charge, the State introduced into evidence a copy of Appellant’s driving record from the Department of Highway Safety and…