Lovelace v. Office of Child Support Enforcement
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.
Appellant Michael Lovelace was found to be the father of a child who had reached majority, and was ordered to pay three years of back child support. He appeals pro se and challenges both the amount of the judgment and the weekly payment amount ordered. We affirm.
On July 17, 1996, this case was heard by the chancellor to determine paternity and establish support for a child who had reached majority at the time of the hearing. Lovelace also represented himself before the trial court. The DNA test established a 99.93% probability of paternity and the court, based on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hubbard v. Shores Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Scroggins v. ScrogginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Mobley v. HarmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement v. HouseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
3Cited by2 opinions
- Office of Child Support Enforcement v. TyraCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Office of Child Support Enforcement v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000