United States v. Dale Lynn Ryan
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
A divided panel of this court affirmed Dale Lynn Ryan’s conviction of violating the federal arson statute, 18 U.S.C. § 844(i). United States v. Ryan, 9 F.3d 660 (8th Cir.1993). We granted rehearing en banc and vacated the panel opinion. Having considered the issue raised by the suggestion for rehearing en banc, we now affirm, and we reinstate the panel opinion as to the other issues raised in Ryan’s initial appeal.
I
We recount only those facts relevant to the issue remaining in this case, referring the reader to the panel opinion for the facts giving rise to the charge…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Darrell Chip Wadena, United States of America v. Jerry Joseph Rawley, Jr., United States of America v. Rick ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.