Bridge & Co. v. McCullough's Adm'rs
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Court of Probate of Mobile. IN the matter of the estate of Charles McCullough, deceased, which was declared insolvent on the 22d March, 1852. Among the claims which wore filed against said estate, within the time prescribed by the statute and the order of the court, were the claims of J. & L. K. Bridge & Co. and J. & G. 0. Alexander & Co., who are the appellants in these two cases; and to the allowance of their claims no objection was raised.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Court of Probate of Mobile. IN the matter of the estate of Charles McCullough, deceased, which was declared insolvent on the 22d March, 1852. Among the claims which wore filed against said estate, within the time prescribed by the statute and the order of the court, were the claims of J. & L. K. Bridge & Co. and J. & G. 0. Alexander & Co., who are the appellants in these two cases; and to the allowance of their claims no objection was raised. On the 5th December, 1854, no person having been nominated to the court by the creditors of the estate as administrator de bonis non,…
1Opinion of the CourtNice, J.
Wo have re-examined the points decided in Smith & Co. v. Mallory’s Ex’r, 24 Ala. 628, and are fully con*663vinced that they were well considered, and correctly decided. Upon tbe authority of that case, we must affirm the decrees in the two cases now under consideration. The action of the court below, in all respects, was authorized by law, and we cannot sustain the objections thereto made by the appellant.
Decree in each case affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- R. W. Smith & Co. v. Mallory's Ex'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
3Cited by5 opinions
- Warren v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Bowen v. Billings, Boise & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1882
- Clark v. Johnson & LattimerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- Claflin & Co. v. Behr's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Rodgers v. MerandaOhio Supreme Court · 1857