Legal Opinion
Mutual Ben. Health & Acc. Ass'n v. Dailey
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 19, 1948No. Civ. No. 5795PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have filed this Bill of In-terpleader, alleging that there are two claimants to the benefits of two insurance policies issued on the life of one Dale Dailey. In her application for the insurance Miss Dailey mimed John E. Upham as the sole beneficiary of the insurance, designating him as her fiance. He is a citizen of the District of Columbia. The other claimant to the insurance is die father of the deceased, who claims both as the Administrator of her estate and as her father. While the Bill avers that it is brought under Interpleader Act of 1936, 28…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McGarry v. City of BethlehemDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- Behlert v. James Foundation of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- Mutual Life Insurance v. LottDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1921
- Ostrow v. Samuel Brilliant Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1946
- Wilson v. GuggenheimDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949