Legal Opinion
Texas & N. O. R. v. Houston Undertaking Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 15, 1919No. 7777PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLane, J.
As appellant has in its brief set out a fair and comprehensive statement of the nature and result of this suit, which has the approval of appellee, we adopt the same as our own:
“Leo. H. Weadock and J. E. Price, doing business under the firm name of Houston Undertaking Company, were conducting in the city of Houston an undertaking business, and, as a part of said busiriess, directing funerals, and also operated an ambulance for the purpose of convoying sick people to the hospitals, and similar work.
“On September 16, 1916, Leo. H. Weadock, one of the members of the firm, was driving the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Waller v. LilesTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Boyd v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1908
- Sabine & East Texas Railway Co v. DeanTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Houston T. C. R. Co. v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Aranda v. Texas & N. O. R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Edson v. Perry-Foley Funeral HomeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Blasdell v. Port Terminal R. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Texas N. O. R. Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.