Legal Opinion

Tyner v. Johnson Ex Rel. Glennan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 12, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County (Petek, J.). ■ The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

We cannot agree with the learned judge who decided this case, in the Court helow, in holding, upon the record now before us, that the deed here in question, should he vacated and annulled, upon the ground of fraud.

The grantor and grantee in the deed, are the defendants, and the plaintiff is a judgment creditor of the grantor, one of the defendants.

On the 5th day of June, 1908, the defendant Tyner and wife conveyed by deed to the defendant, Windom, lots Nos. 16, 17 and 18, in Block No. 1, in North Kensington, Montgomery county, Md., together with the buildings and improvements thereon. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooke v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  2. Totten v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  3. Thompson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  4. Riggin v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drury v. State Capital Bank of Eastern Shore Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  2. McGuigan v. HeuerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Poole v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  4. Flanagan v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  5. Sunderland v. EblingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API