Legal Opinion

Fisher v. City of San Jose

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 11, 2009No. 04-16095PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

We address the Fourth Amendment’s exigent circumstances doctrine in the context of armed standoffs. Steven Fisher triggered a standoff with San Jose police after he pointed a rifle at a private security guard who was investigating loud noises in Fisher’s apartment complex. When the police arrived at his apartment, a noticeably intoxicated Fisher pointed one of his eighteen rifles at the officers and threatened to shoot them. The ensuing standoff lasted more than twelve hours and ended peacefully when Fisher finally emerged and allowed himself to be taken into custody.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Clyde Spencer v. Sharon KrauseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Hopkins v. BonvicinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. StruckmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API