Legal Opinion

S. M. Rose Corp. v. Todini

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 14, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArthur Waohtel, J.

The lessee landlord moves to strike this case from the Jury Calendar. The tenant makes a cross motion to dismiss the petition pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Obviously, if the motion to dismiss prevails, there is no need to consider the motion to strike the case from the Jury Calendar.

The question arising upon the motion to dismiss is whether the provisions of the lease constitute a condition subsequent or a conditional limitation. If they constitute a condition subsequent, then the motion to dismiss must be granted.

The provisions of the lease are as follows:

“ The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. . LeviNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Martin v. CrossleyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
  3. In re Guaranty Building Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. 6th Avenue & 24th Street Corp. v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hayman v. Butler Bros.Syracuse City Court · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Alfalfa D. & M. Co. v. 4010 Washington, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API