Legal Opinion

Colbert v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 15, 1963No. App. No. 9PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

In this application for leave to appeal from the order of the lower court recommitting the petitioner to Patuxent Institution after the second redetermination of his status as a defective delinquent, the petitioner sought leave to appeal as an indigent.

The docket entries show that the petition was duly received *635and filed, but they do not indicate that the petition was submitted to the judge who presided at the redetermination hearing for a determination by the lower court, pursuant to Maryland Rule 894 a 2 (b), as to whether the petitioner is an indigent and unable to “defray the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crisp v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colbert v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Daugherty v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API