Bockman v. World Insurance
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Seaborn Holt, J.
Appellant filed two separate suits against appellees, insurance companies, to recover alleged disability claims under the terms of two insurance policies. The eases were consolidated for trial. Trial to a jury resulted in a verdict for appellees, insurance companies, and from the judgment is this appeal.
The record reflects that appellant filed motion for a new trial, alleging the following grounds, relied upon here: “2. The verdict is contrary to the evidence. 3. The verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence.”
The trial court denied appellant’s motion, using the following language: “The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blackwood v. EadsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Twist v. MullinixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Hall v. W. E. Cox & SonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Presley v. SchenebeckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
3Cited by11 opinions
- Spink v. MourtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Swafford v. Sealtest Foods Division of National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Bailey v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Bockman v. World InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Koonce v. OwensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.