Legal Opinion

Henrickson v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1920No. 15640PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered June 26, 1919, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action in tort.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent, Segrid Henrickson, brought this action against the appellants, O. J. Smith and Hilda M. Smith, to recover the sum of $870 which she claims the appellant O. J. Smith, in his capacity as her attorney, collected for her use and did not account. In her complaint she alleged, in substance, that the appellants are husband and wife and as such form a marital community under the laws of the state of Washington; that the appellant O. J. Smith is an attorney at law, duly licensed to practice in the courts of the state of Washington; that, on November 7, 1916, she was struck by an…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bergman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Mooney v. CarterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  3. Ziomko v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Garrett v. ShannonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. J. D. O'Malley & Co. v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API