Milner v. Earl Fruit Co. of the Northwest
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent
WM.' E. LEE, J.,
Dissenting. — This case was originally assigned to me, and I prepared an opinion which met with the approval of only one of my associates. I am still convinced that it constitutes a correct decision of the questions presented and that the majority opinion does not correctly determine the cause. For this reason I feel that I may be pardoned for thus presenting my views. This action was instituted to recover a balance alleged to be due on a contract for the sale of apples. Respondent alleged that in 1919 he sold and delivered to appellant his crop' of apples at an agreed price,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Butterick Publishing Co. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- State v. BakerIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Trask v. Boise King Placers Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
- Walling v. WallingIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Stein v. FogartyIdaho Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.