In Re Trammell
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, District Judge.
Trammell is a voluntary bankrupt who in his schedules claimed as exempt property of the value allowed by the Constitution of Georgia. Miller Shoe Store, a partnership, is an involuntary bankrupt, the partners in which have, in their duly filed schedules, similarly made claims of exemptions. None of the claimants had, at the time of filing of the bankruptcy petition, or at the time of adjudication, secured any setting apart of exempt property before the state tribunals, nor had made any application therefor. The referee^ in the former ease, on the authority of White v.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- White v. StumpSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Gunn v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Evans v. Rounsaville & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Gheen v. . SummeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Myers v. MatleySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mims v. Dixie Finance Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1976
- Kronstadt v. Citizens & Southern Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Bank of California v. Virtue & Scheck, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Redin v. St. Joseph Hospital EurekaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.