Legal Opinion

Velez v. Division Nine Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered January 22, 2008, which denied third third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing that third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion sought to avoid third-party liability by defeating plaintiffs claim against defendant/third third-party plaintiff. In order to obtain dismissal of the third third-party complaint by this means, third third-party defendant should have moved for summary judgment on both the third third-party complaint and the main complaint by putting all interested…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Bridgehampton National Bank v. SchaffnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API