Legal Opinion · Dissent
Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 1997No. 62222-1Published
1DissentSanders, J.
(dissenting in part) — I dissent from the majority opinion insofar as it reverses the trial court’s award of summary judgment to Leingang on his Consumer Protection Act (CPA) and affirms dismissal of his tortious interference with contract claims. I concur with the majority that Leingang should recover his reasonable attorney fees under Olympic S.S. Co. v. Centennial Ins. Co., 117 Wn.2d 37, 811 P.2d 673 (1991); however, I would also award Leingang reasonable attorney fees under the CPA.
I
Consumer Protection Act
Washington’s Consumer Protection Act broadly provides:
Unfair methods of competition…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.