Legal Opinion

Keller v. Merkel

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1950No. File 9138PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant for an assault and battery. Defendant has appealed. The judgment must be affirmed.

The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury is not questioned. However, we have read the entire transcript of the testimony in considering appellant’s assignments of error relating to the rulings of the trial court on evidence. After such consideration of the transcript we are convinced that no prejudicial error is disclosed in the court’s admission or rejection of the testimony.

The other assignments relate to the giving of certain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Counts v. KarySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of Billings v. Deadwood Congregation of Jehovah WitnessesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Sundt Corp. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. EllefsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. HalversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. AmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API