Legal Opinion

Greely v. Townsend

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1864PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion for a citation to the respondent, on a writ from the United States Circuit Court for California to this Court. The case of Greely v. Townsend and Powelson has not been reported, as it did not involve any point of law not already passed on. It was an action of ejectment brought to recover possession of the western half of Fifty-vara Lot Number One Thousand One Hundred and Eighty-eight, in the City and County of San Francisco.

Read the full summary

Motion for a citation to the respondent, on a writ from the United States Circuit Court for California to this Court. The case of Greely v. Townsend and Powelson has not been reported, as it did not involve any point of law not already passed on. It was an action of ejectment brought to recover possession of the western half of Fifty-vara Lot Number One Thousand One Hundred and Eighty-eight, in the City and County of San Francisco. The defendants, on the trial, offered to deraign a title from an execution sale on a judgment against the city, and offered to show by a decree of confirmation by…

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, C. J.

At the last term of this Court a judgment was rendered in this case affirming the judgment of the Court below. The defendant, against whom the judgment was rendered, now presents a writ of error, addressed to the Justices of this Court, issued by the Clerk of the.Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, and applies to me as Chief Justice of the Court for a citation to the defendant in error. The application is made under the provisions of the twenty-fifth section of an Act of Congress, passed on the 24th of September, 1789, entitled “An Act to establish the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Ferris v. CooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Johnson v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carleton v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Union Central Life Insurance v. GromerSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913
  3. Hind v. Wilder's Steamship Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Lincoln-Lucky & Lee Mining Co. v. District CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Kevan Harry GilmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API