Freeman v. State

Smith, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of two counts of rape. We affirm.

1. In his first enumeration of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial on the general grounds. We disagree. The testimony of the prosecutrix in this case provided ample evidence upon which a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime of rape beyond a reasonable doubt. Driggers v. State, 244 Ga. 160 (259 SE2d 133) (1979).

2. Appellant enumerates as error the trial court’s exclusion of the following testimony of the prosecutrix’ stepfather’s…