Legal Opinion

Brown v. Seabrooks

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided November 20, 2020No. 5:20-cv-00010Unknown

1Opinion

FIONR T THHEE U WNEITSETEDR SNTA DTIESTS RDIICSTT ROIFC TV ICROGUINRITA HARRISONBURG DIVISION ROBERT LEE BROWN, JR., ) ) Case No. 5:20-cv-00010 v. ) ) MILLER SEABROOKS, et al., ) ) By: Michael F. Urbanski Defendant. ) Chief United States District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the court on defendant Robert Lee Brown, Jr.’s (“Brown”) motion to dismiss or strike the counterclaim included in plaintiff Miller Seabrooks’ (“Seabrooks”) amended complaint. ECF No. 27. Brown claims that the counterclaims were compulsory under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 13(a)1 and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  3. Nourison Rug Corp. v. ParvizianCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  4. Galustian v. PeterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  5. Deasy v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API