Reynolds v. Pope
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtRubinow, J.
From representations made, or concurred in, by counsel at the hearing on this motion, it appears that the defendant was given notice to appear for a deposition; was subpoenaed to appear; appeared with his counsel at the appointed time and place; and there, as alleged in the motion, “advised the plaintiff’s attorney that he refused to answer questions in the course of said deposition,” on the ground that to answer might tend to incriminate him. In the motion, the plaintiff requests that the court order the defendant to submit to the taking of the deposition provided for in § 185 of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Meyer v. TunksTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Brill v. StateConnecticut Superior Court · 1965