Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Marshall
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 13, 1929No. 3172. [fn*]PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The appellant company filed this suit to set aside an award made by the Industrial Accident Board to appellee, Marshall. The sufficiency of the pleadings is not questioned, and the following brief summary thereof we think is a sufficient statement of the issues for the purposes of this opinion:
The company alleged that the Accident Board had awarded to Marshall certain sums of money in excess of $500 as compensation for certain injuries sustained by him in the course of his employment by the National Drilling Company; that said drilling company was a subscriber to the Workmen's Compensation…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Texas Employers' Ins. v. TaborTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Consolidated Underwriters v. SaxonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. BrockTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Stimpson v. Bartex Pipe Line Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
- Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Wiggins v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Lloyds Casualty Co. of New York v. GrilliettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.