Legal Opinion

Combs v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 26, 1895PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Case 5 — INDICTMENT. APPEAL FROM POWELL CIRCUIT COURT. 1. The court should have allowed the witnesses, Wm. Bryan and Wm. Thorp, to prove the reputation of Eubank for truth, they having fully qualified themselves. 2. The court erred to the prejudice of defendant in limiting the argument to three hours. 3. The convicts should not have been allowed to testify. (Civil Code, sec. 606, subsec. 8; Ky.

Read the full summary

Case 5 — INDICTMENT. APPEAL FROM POWELL CIRCUIT COURT. 1. The court should have allowed the witnesses, Wm. Bryan and Wm. Thorp, to prove the reputation of Eubank for truth, they having fully qualified themselves. 2. The court erred to the prejudice of defendant in limiting the argument to three hours. 3. The convicts should not have been allowed to testify. (Civil Code, sec. 606, subsec. 8; Ky. Stats., sec. 1180.) The court is asked to overrule the cases of Commonwealth v. McGuire, 84 Ky., 57, and Combs v. Commonwealth, 15 Ky. L. R., 660. 4. As one of the jurors was under twenty-one years of…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE LEWIS

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant, under, an indictment for conspiring witli Jim Combs, Jesse Barnett and Charles Wall, to murder John A. Rose, who was actually killed by Combs and Barnett, has been twice convicted and sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for life, this being the second appeal.

*26We need not state in detail facts proven on the last trial, as they were substantially stated in the opinion of this court on the first appeal. See Combs v. Com., 15 Ky. L. R. 660.

Two accomplices, Wall and Barnett, though already convicted of tlie offense, testified as…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Dayton v. LoryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Income Investors, Inc. v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Tompkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. Teague v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Winchester v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API