Legal Opinion

Sun Bank of Ocala v. Ford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 7, 1989No. 89-507PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an award of attorneys fees.

The issue in this case is the same as that in Head v. Lane, 541 So.2d 672 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). That is, can an attorney and his client enter into a partial contingent fee agreement and then have the court assess a “contingency risk factor” against their losing adversary. See Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985).

We agree with the holding and rationale of Head and certify conflict with First State Insurance Co. v. General Electric Credit Auto Lease, Inc., 518 So.2d 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

*369The order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. First State Ins. Co. v. GEN. ELEC. CR. AUTO LEASE, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Head v. LaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sun Bank of Ocala v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API