Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reger Ex Rel. Reger v. Preston

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1966No. 7972Published

1Dissent

WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals

(dissenting) .

Section 21-1-1(41) (e), N.M.S.A.1953, does not state that only matters in the court file are to be considered in ruling on a motion to dismiss. Whether the party opposing the motion claims inability to comply (the negative aspect, see Ringle Development Corp. v. Chavez, 51 N.M. 156, 180 P.2d 790) or diligence that is compliance (the positive aspect, see Featherstone v. Hanson, 65 N.M. 398, 338 P.2d 298), the motion is to be decided on the basis of what is “made to appear” to the trial court.

How is anything “made to appear” to the trial court? By…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ringle Development Corporation v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Featherstone v. HansonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Sarikey Ex Rel. Stewart v. SandovalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Procter v. Fez ClubNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API