Carolyn Denise Irby v. New York City Transit Authority (m.a.b.s.t.o.a.)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
We take this opportunity to remind district courts and litigants who move for summary judgment against pro se litigants that -the failure to provide the pro se party with notice of the requirements of Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the consequences of noncompliance therewith, will result in vacatur of the summary judgment, no matter how meritorious, unless the movant shows (or it is obvious to the court) that the pro se was aware of this rule’s requirements.
Background
Plaintiff-appellant Carolyn Denise Irby, pro se, appeals from a September 29, 2000 amended judgment of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mcpherson v. CoombeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
3Cited by82 opinions
- Amaker v. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Fredrick K. Koch v. Town of Brattleboro, Vermont, Sherwood D. Lake, Jr., and John Doe, Unidentified Brattleboro Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Ollman v. Special Board of Adjustment No. 1063Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Swift v. TweddellDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008
- Crenshaw v. SyedDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.