Legal Opinion

Gafford v. Dickinson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Brown District Court. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the facts. At the September Term, 1885, the court sustained defendants’ demurrer to plaintiffs’ petition. To reverse this ruling the plaintiffs bring the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

*288The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

The only questions involved in this case arose upon a demurrer to the plaintiffs’ petition. The petition states, among other things, as follows: On. November 5, 1879, William Boyd Dickinson died, leaving as his heirs a wife, Mary Dickinson, now Mary Gafford, and one child, Samuel Boyd Dickinson; he also left a large amount of property, both real' and personal. He also left three brothers, Samuel P. Dickinson, Martin Boyd Dickinson, and John C. Dickinson, and one sister, Susan C. Dickinson. After the death of William Boyd Dickinson, Samuel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Griffith v. GodeySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Shoemaker v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  3. Johnson v. CainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  4. Heward v. SlagleIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Stong v. WilksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ladd v. NystolSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  2. Leslie v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Pickens v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Harmon v. NofireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Fincke v. BundrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API