Legal Opinion

Kaye v. Penn Aluminum Construction Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County

Decided December 6, 1954No. 12Published

1Opinion of the Court

Henninger, P. J.,

Plaintiff in this action is suing defendant for additional commissions which he alleged are due and which he failed to receive because of defendant’s fraudulent accounting to him.

Defendant has filed preliminary objections (1) that there is another suit pending for the same amount; (2) that the claim is insufficiently pleaded, and (3) no allegation whether contract oral or in writing.

Plaintiff concedes the third point, which will be sustained and plaintiffs will be ordered to amend so as to comply with Pennsylvania R. C. P. 1019 (h).

We see no merit in defendant’s objection to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stroh v. UhrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  2. Gilmore v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  3. M'Credy v. FeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  4. Filbert v. HawkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  5. Russell v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API