Legal Opinion
Bailey v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 6, 1985No. 2 (Adv.), September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY,. Judge.
Our primary reason for granting certiorari in this multiple issues appeal was to consider an aspect of discovery in criminal causes. That question is whether oral statements which the State intended to use at trial and which had been made by the defendant to an out-of-state police officer were “statements made by the defendant to a State agent” within the meaning of former Maryland Rule 741 b 2 and present MD. R. 4-263(b)(2). As explained below, we shall hold that the statements made to the out-of-state police officer in this case were discoverable by the defendant and that…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- McMillian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.