Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. Jones

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 4, 1972No. 11728Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBolin, Judge

I concur with that portion of the majority opinion which affirmed the lower court’s finding plaintiff had proved the necessity for expropriating the property, but I respectfully dissent from the amount awarded the landowner.

Underlying all expropriation cases is the constitutional safeguard that “private property shall not be taken or damaged except for public purposes and after just and adequate compensation is paid”. (La.Const. Art. 1, Sec. 2). The taking of private property against the will of the owner, being in derogation of the concept of private ownership of property, should be used…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. BundyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. StinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API