Legal Opinion

Price v. Mauch

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 20, 1981No. CA 80-456Published

1Opinion

Supplemental Opinion on Denial of Petition for Rehearing June 24, 1981

Boundaries — boundary by acquiescence. — In the instant case, there is no doubt that appellants, appellee and their predecessors in title recognized the fence as the dividing line between the East Shores Estates and Yendrek additions, and the law is well settled that when adjoining landowners silently acquiesce for many years in the location of a fence as the visible evidence of the division line and thus apparently consent to that line, the fence line becomes the boundary by acquiescence.

Petition denied.

Tom Glaze, Judge.

We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morton v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Williamson v. RainwaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. Price v. MauchCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API