Legal Opinion

Lessee of Miller v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1798PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Ejectment for lands in Salisbury township. The lessor of the plaintiff claimed the lands in question under the will of his great-grand-father, dated 31st March 1742; who devised the same to John Miller, his son, in general tail. John Miller after his father’s death, constantly resided on the lands, and died about four years ago.

Read the full summary

Ejectment for lands in Salisbury township. The lessor of the plaintiff claimed the lands in question under the will of his great-grand-father, dated 31st March 1742; who devised the same to John Miller, his son, in general tail. John Miller after his father’s death, constantly resided on the lands, and died about four years ago. The defendant claimed 49|- acres, part thereof under a deed from the commissioners of Lancaster county, dated 2d December 1788, in consideration of 671. The same had been advertised as the property of said John Miller, for non-payment of taxes on the 12th August 1788,…

1Opinion of the Court

Sed per our.

The defendant has affirmed the right of the grandfather, tenant in tail, by purchasing from the commissioners the lands as his property. The plaintiff has shown under what title and in what manner his grand-father came into possession of the lands, and that his interest therein ceased with his death, the estate then becoming vested in the plaintiff. Unless the defendant can show some other right under which the grand-father held the lands the plaintiff is under no necessity of going into the previous title. The commissioners having advertised the lands as the property of John…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sallada v. MockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. McGlaughlin's v. McGlauglin's AdministratorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API