Jones v. Brandt

Inasmuch as there are a number of questions decided in this case, I feel that it is my duty to state my reasons for dissenting from the judgment of this court.

While the Austin Company contends that evidence as to conversations between the parties prior to the making of the contract was inadmissible, its first contention is that, if *552admissible, the facts established thereby are not sufficient to form a basis of fraud. With this contention I agree. The undisputed evidence shows that the Brandts knew that the}'' were purchasing a machine to be thereafter manufactured and delivered.

By the special…