Legal Opinion

Paul T. Stone, Inc. v. Metzler

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 25, 1938No. 7003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Suit was , brought in the Municipal Court by Metzler (appellee) against Stone (appellant) upon an alleged oral agreement under which Metzler claimed he was entitled to recover from Stone $545 for services in securing a contract for building a house. The evidence shows that Mr. and Mrs. Kennard wished to acquire a dwelling house in Washington and that they negotiated with Metzler, as broker, for the purchase of a particular lot which they desired; that the- purchase of the lot was to be dependent • upon securing a contract for the building of a house like one which had been recently…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
  2. Sechrist v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908
  3. Rudd v. BuxtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Lee R. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  2. Pryor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Weimann v. SheppardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Prowant v. BurkeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API