Legal Opinion

Richey v. Shell Petroleum Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1939No. 8821PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

Appeal is from a judgment of the trial court, wherein three Rule 37 cases were consolidated and tried as one. Three separate. permits to drill three wells in the East Texas field are involved. One of the permits was attacked by the Humble Oil & Refining Co., as plaintiff, in which the Shell Petroleum Corporation intervened, and the other two by the Shell as plaintiff. Each permit was granted to a distinct and separate party. The Railroad Commission is the only defendant common to all suits. Two of the permits were sustained by the trial court and one was set aside.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. Railroad Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. LasseterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Turnbow v. Barnsdall Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Atlantic Refining Co. v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Railroad Commission v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Railroad Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Selby Oil & Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  5. Spear v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API