Legal Opinion

Mattie K. Carter Trust Ex Rel. Fortson v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided April 11, 2003No. 4:02-cv-00154PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER

MCBRYDE, District Judge.

Before the court for consideration are a motion for partial summary judgment filed by defendant, United States of America (Internal Revenue Service [“IRS”]), and a motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiff, the Mattie Carter Trust (“Carter Trust”), by Benjamin J. Fortson, Jr. (“Fortson”), Trustee. The court, after having reviewed the motions, responses thereto, Carter Trust’s reply, the summary judgment evidence, and applicable authorities, concludes that IRS’ motion should be denied, and that Carter Trust’s motion should be granted.

I

Und…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SolimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. First National Bank of Beeville v. FojtikTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Fojtik v. First National Bank of Beeville, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  4. Hay v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967
  5. George L. Stockwell and Delia Stockwell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aragona Trust v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2014
  2. Estate of Stangeland v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
  3. Aragona Trust v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2014
  4. Frank Aragona Trust, Paul Aragona, Executive Trustee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2014
  5. Frank Aragona Trust, Paul Aragona, Executive Trustee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API