Legal Opinion

Ladner v. Ladner

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided February 18, 2003No. 2001-CA-01771-COAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIDGES, J.,

for the court.

¶ 1. In the swirling eddies of a divorce proceeding, Ruby Ladner obtained a judgment of divorce from Luther Ladner in the Pearl River County Chancery Court. The chancellor granted Luther’s motion for a new trial, and entered amended findings of fact, conclusions of law, and final judgment on June 18, 2001. Joyce appealed without supersedeas bond for an increase in her portion of the marital property; Luther did not cross-appeal nor did he file a su-persedeas bond.

¶ 2. Luther then refused to execute the appropriate quitclaim deeds to convey to Joyce the real property…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McNeil v. HesterMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Parker v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Taylor v. MorrisMississippi Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bert Allen Toyota, Inc. v. GraszCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
  2. Telecom Tower Group, LLC v. Honeysuckle Creek Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  3. Ngoc Mai Nguyen v. Elvis BuiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API