Legal Opinion
Riff v. Clawges
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 3, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 94-2782PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER — MEMORANDUM
NAYTHONS, United States Magistrate Judge.
AND, NOW, this 2nd day of NOVEMBER, 1994, upon consideration of the Defendants’ Motion to Compel directed to Plaintiff, Michele Riff to produce Michael Riff, a minor, plaintiffs son, for purposes of deposition, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.
The defendant states that plaintiff has indicated that she had no prior police contact *358before the incident giving rise to this action. Defendant alleges that it has learned that plaintiffs admission is false and that plaintiff did have prior police contact on at least one occasion…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Frank Grady and John JankowskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Germann v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Consolidated Parlodel LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- HIS ALL HOLINESS, BARTHOLOMEW I, THE ARCHBISHOP OF CONSTANTINOPLE, NEWROME, AND ECUMENICAL PATRIARCH v. PRINCETON UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023