Legal Opinion

Santini Bros. v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The stipulation is enforcible but its meaning is sufficiently ambiguous to require the taking of oral proof of the surrounding facts and circumstances to determine the true meaning and intention of the parties.

The order appealed from entered December 4, 1936, should be reversed and the matter remitted to an official referee to take testimony and report to the Special Term, disposition of the motion to be held in abeyance until the coming in of the referee’s report. The order denying motion for resettlement should be affirmed.

■ Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Order…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marshall v. MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API