Mansfield v. Wagner Electric Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtDavid E. Blair, J.
The action is in damages for personal injuries. Prom a judgment in favor of the defendant entered upon a directed verdict, plaintiff has appealed.
Plaintiff was in the employ of defendant at the time of his injury. He was engaged in polishing a large metal casting with a movable emery wheel. This casting was too heavy to be moved to and held against a stationary emery wheel. The movable emery wheel h§id no hood connected with a blower or suction fan. PartMes flying either from the casting or the wheel by reason of the operation of the rapidly revolving emery wheel entered one of plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Glaser v. RothschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. GotschallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ConartySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stein v. Battenfield Oil & Grease Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Endicott v. St. Regis Investment CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Joyce Labbee, by Pearl Labbee, Next Friend v. Roadway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Burch v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Rittenhouse v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.