Legal Opinion

Woods v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 19, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFORD, J.:

From a judgment of conviction of unarmed robbery this appeal has been perfected. The appellant has posed three questions for our consideration. By these questions two con tentions are advanced. The first is, that the accused was under the influence of intoxicating liquor to such an extent that he was incapable of forming any specific intent to rob. The other is, that the evidence taken as a whole is insufficient.

The record discloses some evidence tending to show that appellant was somewhat under the influence of intoxicating liquor but the evidence on the whole warranted the jury…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dykes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Rushing v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API