Legal Opinion

Bell v. Hotel Sorrento

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1912No. 10362PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from orders of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered February 4, and December 9, 1911, classifying and ordering paid certain claims against an estate, after hearings before the court.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

In this appeal certain creditors of W. C. Bell, deceased, and the guardian of the estate of his minor son, seek a review of two orders of the superior court for King county, the first made on February 4, 1911, and the second on December 9, 1911, by which certain other claims against the estate of W. C. Bell, deceased, were classified and ordered *500paid as allowances to the widow and as expenses of her last illness, during the process of administration of the estate. The facts are not disputed. The deceased and his wife, Elizabeth Young Bell, were residents of the state of Kentucky. In April,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Filley v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Alaska Banking & Safe Deposit Co. v. NoyesWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Sloan v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. In re Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. In re the Estate of MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Meeker v. WaddleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bayer v. BayerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Golden v. McGillWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Varnes v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Cox v. MacKenzieArizona Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API