Legal Opinion

State v. Sanwick

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1986No. 20176PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

2Per curiam

Defendant appeals the sentence on a plea of guilty to rape, a first degree felony under U.C.A., 1953, § 76-5-402 (1978 ed.). He claims that the trial court improperly relied upon hearsay statements in the pre-sentence report in sentencing defendant to prison. Defendant also claims that the court improperly precluded him from confronting his two daughters at the sentencing hearing, thereby denying him due process of law. We affirm.

Defendant was charged with ten counts of rape and sexual abuse of his two minor daughters. He entered a plea of guilty to one count of rape in…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. PereaUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Taylor v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. PatienceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  4. State v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  5. State v. WeeksUtah Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API