Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bradley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Practice in the Supreme Court. Dismissal and reinstatement. Providential cause. Before the Supreme Court. September Term, 1879. Reported in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Justice.

The plaintiff in error, a licensed' attorney formerly authorized to practice law in the superior courts of this state, was removed by the superior court of Chatham county. Code, § 420, et seq. Afterwards, he moved in the same court to set aside the judgment of removal, and the motion being denied, he brought a writ of error to this court. On the record here he was his own counsel, and the sole counsel. When the case was reached in its order on the docket, there was no appearance, and for that reason the writ of error was dismissed. Later in the term, and some time after all…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. BOWEN v. SAVOYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  2. Zorn v. LamarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  3. Williford v. State ex rel. BoykinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API