Legal Opinion

City of Miami v. Bailey & Dawes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 24, 1984No. Nos. 83-1535, 83-1928 and 83-2656PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

After our affirmance of a summary judgment on liability in favor of the plaintiff law firm, City of Miami v. Bailey & Dawes, 423 So.2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), a jury trial to assess the reasonable fee to which it was entitled ended with a verdict of $175,000. A careful review of the record in the light of the points raised on this appeal from the consequent judgment shows that the defendant city has failed to demonstrate that harmful error in fact occurred or that it preserved its present contentions to that effect below. Hercules, Inc. v. Coto, 434 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. JacksonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Bailey v. BaileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Huntley v. BayaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. Page v. Cory CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Metropolitan Dade County v. BrillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGurn v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. McGurn v. ScottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. De Maria Porsche Audi, Inc. v. TinkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API