Kangrga v. Bajkic
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSaul S. Streit, J.
Defendants, Katerina Bajlric, Milan Jovanovic and Sava Jo vano vie, appearing specially, move to set aside the service of the summons and complaint on the ground that the said summons and complaint was never served personally on said defendants.
It is undisputed that the summons and complaint was served pursuant to section 227-a of the Civil Practice Act. Plaintiffs contend that such service was sufficient because the three defendants, consisting of the widow and the alleged sole legatees of Velimir Bajlric, deceased, designated and authorized the appointment of George C. Dix, as ancillary…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hopper v. . HopperNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- In re Gaines' WillNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Milner v. HoagAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burg v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1965
- Titan Research & Development Corp. of America v. DoellerNew York Supreme Court · 1961